Share
Home Sector Energy Saudi Arabia: OPEC+ oil production cuts can continue past March if needed

Saudi Arabia: OPEC+ oil production cuts can continue past March if needed

Putin plans to visit Saudi Arabia, UAE this week, aide says
Saudi Arabia: OPEC+ oil production cuts can continue past March if needed
Saudi's production to remain at 9 mn bpd until March

The OPEC+ oil production cuts can “absolutely” continue past the first quarter if needed, Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman said, as he pledged the curbs would be delivered in full.

Last week, the OPEC+ oil producers reached an agreement to implement voluntary production cuts amounting to approximately 2.2 million barrels per day (bpd) in early 2024.

The Saudi Energy Minister, in an interview with Bloomberg, said the supply reductions announced last week of more than 2 million bpd— about half of which are coming from Saudi Arabia — will only be withdrawn after consideration of market conditions and using a “phased-in approach.”

Furthermore, Saudi Arabia has announced a voluntary extension of its 1 million bpd oil production cut, which began in July, until the end of the first quarter of 2024.

Supporting market stability

The Ministry of Energy, in coordination with select countries participating in the OPEC+ agreement, has announced that Saudi Arabia’s production will be maintained at approximately 9 million bpd until the end of March. These additional reductions are aimed at supporting market stability and will be gradually restored in accordance with prevailing market conditions.

A source from the Ministry of Energy, as reported by the Saudi Press Agency (SPA), stated that this production cut is in addition to the previously announced voluntary cut of 500 thousand barrels per day by the Kingdom in April 2023, which will now be extended until the end of December 2024. Other countries such as Algeria, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Oman have also announced voluntary cuts.

During an interview with Bloomberg, Prince Abdulaziz addressed concerns about crude oil prices, which remained below their pre-OPEC+ levels and were trading near $79 a barrel in London. Market observers expressed doubts about whether all the promised supply cuts would actually materialize, with only about half of the cuts being genuinely new.

Prince Abdulaziz sought to dispel these doubts, affirming in a Monday interview in Riyadh that he firmly believes a reduction of 2.2 million bpd will indeed occur. He expressed confidence that this reduction would even offset the usual inventory builds that typically occur in the first quarter, highlighting positive indications of improving demand.

Read more: OPEC+ agrees voluntary oil production cuts, extends invitation to Brazil to join alliance

Persuading Russia

Regarding the agreement between OPEC and its allies, there is a particular focus on Russia and how it will contribute. Unlike OPEC members, Russia’s contribution comes from export restrictions rather than explicit production cuts, according to Bloomberg.

Prince Abdulaziz expressed his preference for a production cut but was unable to persuade his Russian counterpart. Russia has consistently argued that severe winter weather and geological conditions make it challenging to reduce production in the early months of the year.

“We made an effort,” Prince Abdulaziz remarked, acknowledging the difficulties Russia faces in cutting production during winter.

Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak stated that Russia had decided to reduce oil exports by 500,000 bpd in the first quarter of 2024. This reduction would be distributed as 300,000 bpd of crude oil exports and 200,000 bpd of fuel exports.

Russian President Vladimir Putin is scheduled to visit Saudi Arabia and the UAE this week. According to Yury UshakovPutin’s aide, these visits will be focused on working meetings and negotiations, with discussions planned with the Saudi Crown Prince and UAE officials.

Meanwhile, OPEC Secretary-General Haitham Al Ghais emphasized that advocating for oil to remain underground would not result in an energy transition but rather create chaos in the sector. He stated that saying oil must stay in the ground will lead to energy chaos. 

“We don’t feel that vilifying [the] industry is a constructive approach,” Al Ghais said.

For more news on energy, click here.

The stories on our website are intended for informational purposes only. Those with finance, investment, tax or legal content are not to be taken as financial advice or recommendation. Refer to our full disclaimer policy here.