Elon Musk will withdraw his $97.4 billion bid for OpenAI’s nonprofit arm if the ChatGPT creator ceases its transition into a for-profit organization, according to a court filing. “If OpenAI, Inc.‘s Board is prepared to preserve the charity’s mission and stipulate to take the ‘for sale’ sign off its assets by halting its conversion, Musk will withdraw the bid,” the filing stated, which was submitted on Wednesday to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
“Otherwise, the charity must be compensated by what an arms-length buyer will pay for its assets,” it further explained.
On Monday, Musk, together with his artificial intelligence company xAI and a consortium of investors, initiated a bid to acquire OpenAI’s nonprofit arm for $97.4 billion, accusing the organization and its CEO Sam Altman of abandoning its original purpose of developing AI for the greater good in favor of profit-driven motives. OpenAI was originally established as a nonprofit in 2015 and later transitioned to a “capped profit” model in 2019. Musk played a pivotal role in launching the AI research organization, to which he claims to have contributed $50 million.
Since his exit from the company’s board in 2018, the Tesla and SpaceX founder has openly expressed his dissatisfaction with OpenAI’s shift toward becoming a profit-making entity.
What concerns did Musk raise at the World Governments Summit?
Musk reiterated these concerns on Thursday, addressing an audience via video link at the World Governments Summit in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
When asked by the UAE’s AI minister, Omar al Olama, whether a company like OpenAI could genuinely scale as a nonprofit, Musk responded: “I think the evidence was there in that OpenAI has gotten this far while having at least a sort of dual profit, nonprofit role. What they’re trying to do now is completely delete the nonprofit. And that seems really going too far.” He elaborated, “I provided all of the funding for OpenAI for the first almost $50 million for nothing, as a nonprofit, and it was meant to be open source. And so, you know, I think this is analogous to, like … if you find a nonprofit to preserve the Amazon rainforest, but then … instead they turn into a lumber company and chop down the trees and sell them for wood.”
He concluded that OpenAI should now consider rebranding itself to “maximum profit AI,” or “closed for voracious profit.”
Read more | Musk or Ellison: Who will answer Trump’s call for TikTok?
What is the history behind OpenAI and Musk’s role?
OpenAI was co-founded by Elon Musk and Sam Altman in 2015 as a nonprofit organization with the mission to advance artificial intelligence in a manner that benefits humanity. However, Musk exited the organization in 2018 due to disagreements regarding its direction and funding approaches. Since then, OpenAI has undergone considerable evolution. Under Altman’s leadership, the company introduced a for-profit division to attract investments from major entities like Microsoft. This transition has enabled OpenAI to secure significant funding, which is vital in the rapidly progressing AI industry.
Currently, Musk is seeking to obstruct OpenAI’s shift to a for-profit model. His legal team contends that if OpenAI’s board is willing to uphold the charity’s original mission and cease its conversion, Musk will retract his bid. This position underscores Musk’s persistent concern regarding the ethical ramifications of AI development. He asserts that the nonprofit model is crucial for ensuring that AI technology is developed in a responsible manner for the benefit of all. However, this stance complicates OpenAI’s efforts to acquire the capital needed to remain competitive in the AI sector.
How could Musk’s bid impact OpenAI and the AI landscape?
Musk’s bid for OpenAI’s nonprofit arm carries significant ramifications for both the organization and the broader AI landscape. If OpenAI continues its shift to a for-profit model, it risks undermining the foundational mission that Musk and Altman initially envisioned. Musk’s legal representatives have made it clear that if OpenAI does not adhere to their stipulations, the nonprofit must receive fair compensation for its assets. This could establish a high valuation for the nonprofit, complicating OpenAI’s restructuring efforts.
Analysts have observed that Musk’s bid could create a challenging landscape for OpenAI. The uncertainty surrounding the bid may impede the company’s ability to attract new investments and partnerships. Furthermore, concerns have emerged regarding how OpenAI will fairly allocate its assets between the nonprofit and for-profit divisions. This situation could give rise to conflicts of interest and ethical dilemmas as the organization navigates its future.
